MySay: Tun Ismail's son responds to Najib's request for a RM100 million property

MySay: Tun Ismail's son response to Najib's request for a RM100 million property

MySay: Tun Ismail's son response to Najib's request for a RM100 million property

-A +A

I was asked to comment on Najib’s request for a RM100 million property. This is my response:

“Life is unfair. When Tunku, retired Kenny Hills was renamed Bukit Tunku and Tunku was given a house at the foot of Bukit Tunku. When Tun Razak passed away, his widow and family were given a house in Jalan Eaton just off Circular Road, which was renamed Jalan Tun Razak. When my father died, he died as the acting prime minister in a house he owned, but my mother had to surrender the government car and received nothing from the Tun Razak government except for a pension my father was entitled to. Several government properties were named after my father but some were taken away during Dr Mahathir’s premiership, like the Tun Ismail Atomic Research Centre (Pusat Penyelidikan Atom Tun Dr Ismail or PUSPATI), and a memorial budgeted for and supposedly to be implemented by the National Archives has not taken off and many Malaysians as a result have largely forgotten Tun Dr Ismail and the ideals he fought and lived for.

Would it be proper for me as his eldest son to ask for fairness from the government to an entitlement now as passed by Parliament? If Najib can request property worth RM100 million, what is my late father’s worth at 1973 valued at today’s prices? If the children of past PMs can inherit lucrative properties gifted to their fathers or the widows of ex-PMs, should I and my siblings be deprived? What can subsequent governments since Tun Razak’s PM-ship point to that was given to my family, even as a token, of the nation’s gratitude?

Can I at least ask for seed capital or an asset I could monetise to set up a fund for scholarships in my father’s name, The Tun Dr Ismail Scholarship, which incidentally was Maybank’s proposed tribute to him as an ex-chairman of Malayan Banking, but which never took off?

My conclusion:

My late father asked for no reward or recognition for the work he voluntarily and willingly gave his life for, for the nation he loved, and it would not be proper for me to burden the nation with any guilt or regret at not giving material wealth as a reward. But I do ask that his vision and ideals for the nation as recorded in his Hansard speeches and his policy pronouncements be enshrined and imparted as education at schools and universities so we can be a better nation.