This article first appeared in Forum, The Edge Malaysia Weekly on January 27, 2020 - February 2, 2020
Taiwan’s independence-leaning President Tsai Ing-wen has won re-election with a resounding 57.1% of the votes, leaving her main opponent, Han Kuo-yu of the China-leaning Kuomintang (KMT), with only 38.6%. Tsai’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) confounded pollsters by securing 61 seats, and so retained control of the 113-seat legislature. That Tsai and the DPP achieved this, as the turnout surged to 74.9% from 66% in the last elections in 2016, only added to the convincing nature of her victory.
The question is: What does this mean for Asia and of course for Taiwan, which the Beijing leadership insists is part of China? There are two important ways this election will affect the rest of Asia. First, if China steps up all kinds of pressures on Taiwan, it could become a flashpoint between the US and China. Second, the election could put at risk the territory’s tentative economic revival.
China’s reaction could spell trouble for Taiwan and the rest of Asia
China is unlikely to become more accommodating of Taiwan following the election, for a number of reasons:
At one level, China’s President Xi Jinping has often repeated that he does not want the question of Taiwan’s reunification with China to be passed on from one generation of leaders to another. That suggests his occasional mention of reunification, by force if necessary, should be taken seriously. Xi-watchers believe that Xi — who has just been proclaimed the “People’s Leader”, an honorific once only reserved for Mao Zedong — hankers after being the leader to reunite all of China. That was something that even Mao could not achieve. Even if this view over-personalises the matter, it is clear that the political leadership in Beijing, as well as most of the Chinese people, would like to see Taiwan once again as a full part of China.
In fact, this desire goes beyond just nationalism or emotion. A cursory look at the map shows why China cannot ever be militarily secure without controlling Taiwan. Taiwan is located just across from China’s coastal regions where most of its political, economic and military assets are concentrated. Unlike the US, which is protected by two huge oceans and has land borders only with two friendly countries, China’s coast is completely exposed to foreign invasion. Worse still, an increasingly hostile US has military bases in its neighbours, Japan and South Korea, and a strong alliance with Taiwan. This defence vulnerability is simply untenable for China’s leaders.
Finally, China cannot be happy because the election makes clear that a separate sense of Taiwanese identity has taken root in the majority of Taiwanese. After all, Tsai had been trailing badly in the polls up to the middle of 2019. The main reason she was able to turn the tables on her opponent was that China’s hardline stance on the Hong Kong protests aroused Taiwanese fears of what would happen to their democratic freedoms if China ever took control.
The Hong Kong crisis has also persuaded most Taiwanese that the “One Country, Two Systems” model Hong Kong operates under and which Beijing has offered to Taiwan has failed. Indeed, surveys show an inexorable growth in Taiwanese identity — as of the middle of 2019, around 57% of Taiwanese saw themselves as only Taiwanese while just 36% saw themselves as both Taiwanese and Chinese; fewer than 4% saw themselves as purely Chinese. In 1992, less than 20% of Taiwanese believed in a separate Taiwanese identity, while about half saw themselves as both Chinese and Taiwanese. Despite the allure of growing rich in China’s economic boom, young Taiwanese in particular reject a Chinese identity.
China will now realise that more and more Taiwanese are hostile to reunification, and even the KMT cannot be relied on any more to mobilise support for a closer relationship with China. Beijing has two choices — it could become more accommodating of Taiwanese aspirations for democracy and identity, or it could pursue its recent pressure tactics more aggressively to bring Taiwan to heel. Unfortunately, there is nothing in China’s recent conduct to suggest that it might choose the first option. Indeed, China reacted furiously to the election result, with Foreign Minister Wang Yi insisting that Taiwan’s reunification with mainland China was inevitable and that separatists (that is, Tsai and her supporters) would “stink for 10,000 years”. State media on the mainland has claimed that “external dark forces” had somehow manipulated the election result.
China’s strategy appears to be to create such overwhelming pressure on Taiwan that over time, the Taiwanese people will accept that the least bad option would be to accept reunification on Chinese terms. With this election result, the mainland authorities will want to intensify this approach. In the coming years, we should expect China to:
The trouble is, it is unlikely that the US or Japan would stand aside and watch Taiwan sink under Chinese pressure. The strategic and economic value of Taiwan to both these countries is immense and even an administration as transactional as the current American one is unlikely to be passive in the face of the likely Chinese campaign against Taiwan. The current mood in the US is increasingly hostile to China, and Taiwan has deep support within the American national security groups,in Congress and think-tanks and academics who influence policy. It is quite likely that Taiwan will increasingly become a source of friction between China on one side and the US and Japan on the other.
Taiwan’s economy is reviving – can it withstand Chinese pressure?
An ageing workforce and a population that is expected to begin declining by 2021 are major headwinds to Taiwan’s economic growth potential. These headwinds will worsen, if anything, but nevertheless, Taiwan has enjoyed some good economic news of late.
Its economy appears to be regaining some of the verve it has been lacking in the past 20 years and which produced a long period of stagnant household incomes that spurred many Taiwanese to seek better jobs in the mainland and Taiwanese companies to invest there as well.
First is the relocation of production back to Taiwan from China: About US$24 billion ($97.7 billion) of investment is returning to Taiwan, much of it in high technology. That will bring back demand for highly skilled jobs and a greater chance of reversing the stagnation in salaries of recent times. It will also help generate an ecosystem of suppliers of components and services.
Second, while Taiwan still continues to grow its advantages in electronics and related areas, more new engines of growth are emerging:
The question then is — will China’s political campaign against Taiwan undermine this putative revival? It is certainly a threat, but it is worth noting that Taiwan has a vibrant and highly diverse corporate sector that could enable it to work around such threats. For a relatively small economy with around 23 million people, Taiwan has an impressive number of globally-scaled and indigenously-owned corporations, some of whom are world leaders in high technology as well as in old industries such as shipping. Also, it has a larger base of entrepreneurial, highly flexible home-grown small and medium enterprises. And it has practised judicious but highly successful form of state intervention (such as Hsinchu Science Park and the more recent biotech initiatives).
Taiwan is clearly at a turning point with important ramifications for the rest of Asia. A period of growing friction between the US and China over Taiwan is possible as Chinese pressure on Taiwan grows. In the meantime, Taiwan’s economy is regaining some of its vitality and could enjoy a high quality of growth in coming years — so long as the political headwinds are contained.
Manu Bhaskaran is a partner and head of economic research at Centennial Group Inc, an economics consultancy
Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy.
P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's AppStore and Androids' Google Play.